Instituto
de Permacultura Cerrado-Pantanal
|
|
English Index |
Project NameRighting/Writing “Ribeirinho[i]” HistoryProject PurposeTo train youth from seven poor “ribeirinho” communities within the Pantanal area to work with their communities to develop a clear understanding of the future development options that their community has, and to help them start moving toward the community’s preferred options.
Project DescriptionThe adage that the “youth are the leaders of tomorrow” is old, but exact. Deep, lasting changes that can help solve the social and environmental problems we face today, necessitate deep lasting changes in the people who will be making the decisions in the near future. As Albert Einstein said “We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them”. This project will work with a group of youth to help start that process of deep transformation. The project does not aim to give the youth a new vision for the future, rather, it will train them in the tools needed to create and activate a new vision for themselves and their home community. Through a series of intensive seminars, interspaced with activities within their communities, the youth will create a “Living History” of their community. A history that starts with the formation of the community, and only ends when their children are adults. Using
fully participative and highly creative processes, participants will learn to
assess their own abilities and strengths and plan a better future for
themselves. These lessons will be scaled up into the community. They will lead
their community through an analogue process until the community has determined
and emthuisiastically grasped a better future for themselves. Estimated BudgetR$120.000,00 Project Details
AudienceThe
project audience directly involved with the project are the 30 youth
representing 7 poor “ribeirinho” communities in the Corumba region.
Throughout the training, these youth will interacte intensively with their
communities and help the community think about its future and develop various
viable options – scenarios. To the extent that the community will have a
clearer vision, and indeed a plan of development, the whole community is
really the key stakeholder in this project (this represents approximately 4000
individuals). Note
that the youth of each community will decide who actually participates in the
program, the only restriction being imposed by the project being that, the
decision process be fully democratic and that genders are equally represented,
ie each community will be represented by 2 males and 2 females.
Operating Proceedures The
basic methodology underlying this whole project is the Futures Scenarios[ii]
process as promoted by Global Business Network. Within this guideline, the
project methodolgy is considerably influenced by George Roths “Learning
History”[iii]
approach and the graphic communication concepts of Michael Erickson[iv].
In addition, within the conferences, the process of Open Space
Technology[v]
and Action Learning will be used
extensively. Time Schedule1.
Preparation
4 weeks 2.
Youth Conference – Discovering our History
1
week (Conf = 3 days) 3.
Participatory Research within home Community
4
weeks 4.
Youth Conference – Creating Scenarios for the Future
1 week (Conf = 4 days) 5.
Participatory Analysis of Scenarios within home Community
4 weeks 6.
Youth Conference – Stepping into the Future
1
week (Conf = 3 days) 7.
Participatory Planning in home Community
4 weeks 8.
Youth Conference – Making it Happen – Plenary
1 week (Conf = 2 days) 9.
On-going Follow-up and Support
8mnths (12 days contact) Anticipated
Outcomes/Impacts
Physical
outcomes from the project include
The
social outcomes are less tangibe, and yet more important and more powerful.
Through the program of interactions with their youth, each of the seven
communities will be challenged to think about themselves as a community, and
to think even more deeply about the future they want for themselves and their
children. The result will be a community with a clearer vision of its
direction of development and a determination to achieve that development. The
youth themselves will be the most important outcome. The sequence of
activities will encourage the youth to become self-organised and
self-motivated. In order to collect the information they need to complete the
various activities, they will engage most of their community in interviews,
they will connvene and conduct group meetings and discussions, they will
facilitate community meetings, they will analysise and summarise all this
input, and finally they will present their work in a clear, concise form. The
skills learnt through this process will be invaluable for them to continue a
role of leadership and influence within their community in the future. Methodology
To
date, the methodologies of Open Space Technology, Learning Histories and
Future Scenarios have been exclusively used in corporate and larger-scale
settings. This project will apply
these recent developments in truly participative technology to the rural and
community development fields. While the corporate sector is rapidly developing
advanced participative tools, the development sector is lagging well behind.
Despite much rhetoric about participation ever since the Earth Summit in Rio
(1992), the reality of the situation is that many communties are still being
offered solution-oriented programs, developed by outside experts, and often
offered on a “take-it-as-is-or-get-nothing”
basis. This project will demonstrate the advantages of using deeply
participative processes within a rural community development project. As such
is has important implications for all project planning and implimentation. The
youth will be encouraged to develop their own work plans and will almost
totally decide the details of the format of their presentations. All
assessments during the program will be peer-based assessments. Creativity,
initiative and self-motivation will be constantly supported and rewarded. Resources RequiredIn
addition to the two key facilitators from the Instituto, the human resources
needed include a graphic artist and secretary during the conference periods. The
physical resources required are those normally required for a conference;
venue, accomodation, communication system, meeting facilities, photocopier,
computer access, telephone access…In order to facilitate the data collection
within the communities, each community group will be supplied with a small
camera, a tape recorder and an allocation for film and processing. In
addition to wages for staff, basic travel costs and consumable items, the main
financial resource needed is financial support for the youth during the 4
months they are totally enganged with this project. In addition to covering
their travel, accomodation and food costs during the conferences, participants
will receive a support allowance of R200,00 a month, for the four months of
the project, as it is recognised that their intensive involvement with the
project represents a
severe financial strain on their families, during this period. Organisation
Details
Contact
Name
Snr. Skye Organisation
Instituto de Permacultura Cerrado-Pantanal – a not-for-profit
organisation registered within the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Address
Rua Horto das Olivieras 738, Granja São Luis,
CEP 79074-070, Campo
Grande, MS, Brasil Telefono
67 385 0546 Email
florar@terra.com.br SummaryWith
the coming of the Pantanal Project, this project is especially critical for
these communitites. Rather than meekling accepting whatever
externally-designed scheme Project Pantanal may offer, these communities will
be in a position to pro-actively state clearly what they want for their own
development. These communities, and their inspired youth, will be able to take
advantage of the resources offered, and step boldly into the future – a
future determined by themselves. [i]
Ribierinho measn “riverside” – the communities that live on the banks
of the rivers within the Pantanal area. Most of these communities are
traditionally largely dependant on fishing for their income. Recent
government legislation banning all fishing during two months each year (to
protect fishing stocks) has severely affected these communities.
[ii]
Future Scenarios is process that seeks to define the possible directions
that group or community has available. Promoted by the Global
Business Network, it has been extensively used by Royal Duth Shell Co.
in their planning operations and was instrumental in the rebuilding
processes of South Africa (The
Mont Fleur Scenarios, What
will South Africa be like in the year 2002?, Deeper News, Vol 7 No. 1, GBN),
Columbia (Destino Columbia, A
Scenario-Planning Process for the New Millenium, Deeper News, Vol 9 No. 1,
GBN. ) and
Guatamala (Vision Guatamala, www.citel.com.gt/visionguate . This work has
been particularly pioneered by Adam Kahane (How to Change the World, A
Kahane, July 2000, GBN). [iii]
“Learning Histories” is an organisational change tool developed by Prof
George Roth, MIT. – www.learninghistories.com [iv]
Michael Erickson is graphic artist with Boeing Corporation. –
http://members.tripod.com/~michael_erickson/main [v]
Open Space Technology – World Bank Participation Sourcebook.
|